Call of Duty 4 Pwns.
› Forums › General Discussion › Call of Duty 4 Pwns.
- This topic has 21 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 7 months ago by
OutLaw2112.
- Post
- Replies
-
Yeah I got it, Awesome game i must say, Online im 55 Second Prestige, and dont plan on going Prestige again, Colorful symbols arent enough to sway me.
As for Martyrdom, i dont mind it, every time i see that grenade indicator i just run. I hate last stand, cause if you knock them into last stand, retarded team mates can steal your kills.
I found that COD4 doesn’t stand up to the depth and control you have in other shooter games of late. I really dislike the fact that it’s basically “fire sidestep behind a wall run”, whereas something like Gears of War has a cover system that really makes you think about your surroundings. I feel it’s just the same old, tired, worn out formula with a fancy new paintjob.
COD4 is a barrel of fun. I picked it up yesterday in fact and have had a hard time turning it off.
To be honest the multiplayer aspect of it seems a bit much like CSS so far. The camping/sniping nature of it doesn’t appeal to me so much. I preffer FPS where you allways know where your enemy are and its more a matter of strategy than just sitting and waiting for someone to pop their head up.
Single player is amazing though. It feels like I’m watching a movie half the time.
wow, such a good game.. but short…
I got it when it was just out, finished it in about 2-3 days
now I play multiplayer from time to time..about crysis…
crysis graphics are a lot better, although COD4 got a really nice touch..
their both good at their field, but Crysis is probably the best and “heaviest” game out there right now..I think I prefer the gameplay of COD.. but that just a personal issue…
If my computer was able to run Crysis (and not on mini-minimum lol) then I would have buy/download it..@Alex 2548 wrote:
I found that COD4 doesn’t stand up to the depth and control you have in other shooter games of late. I really dislike the fact that it’s basically “fire sidestep behind a wall run”, whereas something like Gears of War has a cover system that really makes you think about your surroundings. I feel it’s just the same old, tired, worn out formula with a fancy new paintjob.
Man i thought it was something fresh finally.
Gears for some reason i cant stand online, Its so slow and short. You die, wait for game to end, then go again. Nothing beats the rush of Domination on COD4, love it, Fast action, bombs going off everywhere!!
“fire, sidestep behind a wall, run”
lol, That would just get me killed, if you know how to aim real well, those sidesteppers fall nicely into your bullets 😀
@Nocturnal Majesty 2594 wrote:
Man i thought it was something fresh finally.
Gears for some reason i cant stand online, Its so slow and short. You die, wait for game to end, then go again. Nothing beats the rush of Domination on COD4, love it, Fast action, bombs going off everywhere!!
“fire, sidestep behind a wall, run”
lol, That would just get me killed, if you know how to aim real well, those sidesteppers fall nicely into your bullets 😀
I know what you mean maate. The fast action game is quite fun online or with friends. But to me, a decent FPS isn’t just about being quick. I feel like COD is more like a competition of who has the fastest reactions and who can press a button quickest, whereas other format shooters seem to have much more to them, and actually relate more to where/when they are set. It just seems to me that you could take COD4, put any other time/place/situation ‘skin’ on it, and it’d be the same. For me, (sorry to refer to it again but) GoW is so much more. It just seems that COD got raped when it went into the “Super nerd” territory, where everyone who played it online was so good at it it was like they were playing just to be good, not because they liked the game (I’m talking more of the COD1/2 era)
Sorry about the rant, I’m slightly drunk and really don’t like COD4 :p
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.