When your string breaks…

Forums Guitars, Gear, Software & Education When your string breaks…

  • Post
    Avatar
    FretDancer69
    Member

    Hey all, just a little curious, when a string breaks from your guitar, do you rather change all the strings for new ones, or just change the broken one for a new one?

Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Replies
    Avatar
    billmeedog
    Member

    @FretDancer69 9333 wrote:

    Hey all, just a little curious, when a string breaks from your guitar, do you rather change all the strings for new ones, or just change the broken one for a new one?

    Hello FretDancer69, πŸ™‚

    I think the answer to your question depends on how new the strings are when the singl-string breaks. Also, I think one’s personal preference for how “NEW” one likes their strings factors in too.

    For example, I’ve read that Eric Clapton HATED new strings, and only would gig on strings that were atleast a few weeks old. Well, that makes sense considering how “brown” (warm, midrange-meets-bass, lack-of-treble, etc.) Clapton prefers his tone. (I believe he used to call it the “Woman-Tone!” The famous bassist James Jamerson (of Motown studio fame) Used the same set of string son his Fender Jazz Bass for 7 years!!!(Bass is a different animal though!) ANyways, for those who prefer a bit more attack and treble in their tone, they’d need newer strings. I liken it to oil in a car. Would you rather keep adding a quart, or would you rather know that your oil is ALL fresh and consistent (by changing all-of-the-oil!) 😎

    That’s my opinion. I generally change ’em all, unless I had JUST changed them a few days earlier, then I’ll do the single-string! πŸ˜‰

    ~Bill Meehan~ πŸ˜€

    Avatar
    Mandz
    Member

    I agree with Bill’s first and last paragraphs.

    Also, if I’m gigging/recording on a regular basis I change them all at the same time. That way I know I can rely on them to give me a consistent tone across all of the strings and also get me through a gig with less likelihood of one of them breaking mid-song. I almost always change them after every 2 gigs. 1 gig if its a long gig or particularly humid.

    I can’t think of any musical style I enjoy playing that sounds better to my ears with older strings than with new ones.

    If I’m not gigging or recording then tone is not usually so much of an issue. At this point economics is a factor (I find strings to be quite expensive) and I avoid changing strings till they break/rust, at which point I’ll just replace the broken one. Luckily, my sweat seems to make strings last longer rather than rusting them quickly. When I play on a friend’s rusty/dirty strings I usually rub them clean with a cloth/tissue and after about half-an-hour of playing they are pretty smooth and slick to the touch. They probably still look black and sound like ****e though πŸ˜€

    I’ve never used coated strings, but many people seem to love them. Also, haven’t tried stainless steel strings either. I understand that both of these types lead to your strings lasting much longer. I’d like to get some coated strings for my acoustic as I don’t play it that much so I want the strings to last as long as possible and stainless steel for my electric so it’ll last a little longer between string changes.

    I always replace them all at once, unless I’m playing live.

    I try to replace mine every month or so, although often I simply can’t be bothered. I personally am not a fan of the brightness brand new strings give (especially as I play a Strat player primarily), although once they’ve worn in for a few days they sound perfect to my ears. I suppose from thereon the tone deteriorates, but I don’t really mind the tone, it’s the feeling of grime on my strings that ultimately makes me change.

    On an acoustic though…I love new strings, nothing sounds better in my opinion.

    Avatar
    billmeedog
    Member

    @TheAngusBurger 9525 wrote:

    I try to replace mine every month or so, although often I simply can’t be bothered. I personally am not a fan of the brightness brand new strings give (especially as I play a Strat player primarily), although once they’ve worn in for a few days they sound perfect to my ears. I suppose from thereon the tone deteriorates, but I don’t really mind the tone, it’s the feeling of grime on my strings that ultimately makes me change.

    On an acoustic though…I love new strings, nothing sounds better in my opinion.

    Hey AngusBurger, πŸ™‚

    I understand your opinion, especially as it pertains to inherently “bright-sounding” guitars in general (Strats, Teles, etc.) The Eric Clapton and James Jamerson anecdotes I shared earlier certainly support your point! However, I personally like my acoustic strings a bit “worn-in” and thus some of that “new-string-squeak” diminished! 😎 I suppose the context would affect my opinion also (like recording versus live-performance…)

    Good points “beefy!” (LOL!) :rolleyes: πŸ˜‰

    ~Bill Meehan~ πŸ˜€

    Avatar
    peterg.
    Member

    i change all the strings
    but…i have nearly NEVER a string break maybe one ore two times a year.( knock on wood…)

    but i do not play more than 2 gigs with the same strings.
    (on my main guitar …the spare guitars may have older strings )

    Do you know the Big BendΒ΄s Nut Sauce?
    if you your strings break often , this could help!

    and on acoustics i love new strings too

    *Peter*

    Avatar
    etcetera29
    Member

    Now-a-days, I change them all, but when I was younger and didn’t have the money to spend I would just get out the needle nosed pliers and repair the broken string. I always used Earnie Ball strings and would just re-wrap the ball end of the string. One thing I usually do that a lot of people I know don’t bother with is to put solder over the wound part of the ball end of new and repaired strings. This helps to keep things tight down there, so they don’t pull loose and de-tune. Especially on strings that have been repaired.

Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.